A statement inserted in the Journal of a chamber of several of its Members indicating what their intentions were in supporting a particular bill. A statement is put in the official record for use by the court in possible future litigation dealing with provisions of a bill.
Also called legislative histories, which are citations to and the text of internal documents generated in the legislative process, and include any comments by the president upon signing the legislation or issuing a veto message. These are often consulted by the courts to determine the intent of the original law.
The background and events leading up to the enactment of a law. Such is looked to when court attempts to interpret a statue which is ambiguous or inconsistent.
what the Legislature really meant when it approved a specific law.
Used by courts to interpret statutes when the actual wording of the law is ambiguous or unclear. It consists of members' statements made during debate on a bill. Sometimes members make statements about a bill's meaning during debate specifically to establish legislative intent.
If the words of a law can be broadly interpreted, the court may refer to the journal to establish the "intent" of the legislature in passing certain bills.
In law, the legislative intent of the legislature in enacting legislation may sometimes be considered by the judiciary when interpreting the law (see judicial interpretation). The judiciary may attempt to assess legislative intent where legislation is ambiguous, or does not appear to directly or adequately address a particular issue.