Occurs when two or more perils cause a loss. When one of these perils was covered by an insurance contract, but the other peril was not, courts generally ruled that the entire loss would be covered, even the part of the loss attributable to the peril not covered. Many insurance policies have been reworded to clarify that only loss attributable to a covered peril will be covered.
A legal doctrine that states when a property loss is due to two causes (one that's covered and one that isn't) the policy provides coverage.
Two or more proximate causes of an insured loss any one of which, according to some courts, will trigger the insurance, provided such cause is an insured peril.
Legal doctrine that states when a property loss is due to two causes, one that is excluded and one that is covered, the policy provides coverage.
When two perils contribute concurrently to a property loss, one excluded and the other not, the effect of the exclusion tends to be voided in a policy covering on an open perils basis. A concurrent causation exclusion is found in current forms.
A term referring to two or more perils acting concurrently (at the same time or in sequence) to cause a loss. This created problems for property insurers when one of the perils was covered and one was not, and it led to recent revisions in policy language.